Agricultural Research Management Information System

  • Home
  • Research Summary
    • All
    • Government Organization
      • Agriculture Training Institute, Ishwardi, Pabna
      • Bangabandhu academy for poverty alleviation and rural development (BAPARD)
      • Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science & Technology University
      • Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics
      • Bangladesh Institute of Health Sciences
      • Bangladesh Institute of Tropical & Infections Diseases (BITID)
      • Bangladesh Meteorological Department
      • Bangladesh National Herbarium
      • Bangladesh Space Research and Remote Sensing Organization
      • Bangladesh Technical Educational Board
      • Barind Multipurpose Development Authority
      • Central Cattle Breeding Station
      • Department of Agriculture Extension
      • Department of Fisheries
      • Department of Livestock Services
      • Department of Youth Development
      • Dhaka Medical College
      • Geological Survey of Bangladesh
      • Institute of Epidemiology, Disease Control & Research
      • Jatiya Kabi Kazi Nazrul Islam University
      • Khulna Govt. Women College
      • Livestock Training Institute
      • Local Government Engineering Department
      • Ministry of Agriculture
      • Ministry of Environment and forest
      • Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock
      • Ministry of Labour & Employement
      • Ministry of Land
      • Ministry of Public Administration
      • Ministry of Textiles and Jute
      • Ministry of Water Resources
      • Ministry of Youth and Sports
      • National Agricultural Training Academy
      • National institute of preventive and social medicine
      • National Mushroom Development and Extension Centre
      • Pabna University of Science and Technology
      • Seed Certification Agency
      • Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College
      • Sheikh Hasina University
      • University Grants Commission
      • Youth Training Centre
    • Autonomous/Semi-gov Org
      • Bangladesh Academy for Rural Development
      • Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation
      • Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission
      • Bangladesh Council of Scientific and Industrial Research
      • Bangladesh Fisheries Development Corporation
      • Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies
      • Bangladesh Institute of Management
      • Bangladesh Milk Producers Cooperative Union Limited
      • Bangladesh Water Development Board
      • BIRDEM
      • Center for Environmental and Geographic Information Services
      • Hortex Foundation
      • Institute of Water Modeling
      • National Institute of Biotechnology
      • River Research Institute
      • Rural Development Academy
    • NARS
      • Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council
      • Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Forest Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture
      • Bangladesh Jute Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Rice Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Sericulture Research and Training Institute
      • Bangladesh Sugarcrop Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Tea Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute
      • Cotton Development Board
      • Soil Resource Development Institute
    • Public University
      • Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology
      • Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University
      • Bangamata Sheikh Fojilatunnesa Mujib Science and Technology University
      • Bangladesh Agricultural University
      • Bangladesh Open University
      • Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology
      • Bangladesh University of Professionals
      • Bangladesh University of Textiles
      • Barisal Government Veterinary College
      • Begum Rokeya University
      • Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology
      • Chittagong Veterinary and Animal Science University
      • Comilla University
      • Dhaka University of Engineering & Technology
      • Dinajpur Government Veterinary College, Dinajpur
      • Gono Bishwabidyalay
      • Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University
      • Islamic University, Kushtia
      • Jagannath University
      • Jahangirnagar University
      • Jessore University of Science and Technology
      • Jhenaidha Government Veterinary College
      • Khulna Agricultural University
      • Khulna University
      • Khulna University of Engineering & Technology
      • Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University
      • Millitary Institute of Science and Technology
      • National University
      • Noakhali Science and Technology University
      • Patuakhali Science and Technology University
      • Rajshahi University of Engineering and Technology
      • Shahjalal University of Science & Technology
      • Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University
      • Sylhet Agricultural University
      • Sylhet Government Veterinary College
      • University of Barisal
      • University of Chittagong
      • University of Dhaka
      • University of Rajshahi
    • Private University
      • Asian University of Bangladesh
      • Atish Dipankar University of Science and Technology
      • BGC Trust University Bangladesh
      • BGMEA University of Fashion & Technology (BUFT)
      • BRAC University
      • City University
      • Daffodil International University
      • East West University
      • Exim Bank Agricultural University
      • Gana Bishwabiddalaya
      • Hamdard University
      • Independent University, Bangladesh
      • International Islamic University Chittagong
      • International University of Business Agriculture and Technology
      • Islamic University of Technology
      • Leading University, Sylhet
      • North South University
      • Premier University
      • Primeasia University
      • Private University
      • SOAS, University of London
      • Southeast University
      • Stamford University
      • State University of Bangladesh
      • The Millenium University
      • University of Asia Pacific
      • University of Development Alternative
      • University of Information Technology and Sciences
      • University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh
      • University of Science and Technology, Chittagong
      • World University
    • INGO/IO/NGO/Private Org
      • ACI Limited
      • Agricultural Advisory Society (AAS)
      • Apex Organic Industries Limited
      • Arannayk Foundation
      • Bangladesh Academy of Sciences
      • Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies
      • Bangladesh Institute of Social Research
      • Bangladesh Science Foundation
      • Bangladesh Unnayan Parishad
      • BAPA
      • BRAC
      • CARE Bangladesh
      • CARITAS
      • Centre for Environmental Geographical Information System
      • Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD)
      • Creative Conservation Alliance
      • Dhaka Ahsania Mission
      • Dwip Unnayan Sangstha
      • EMBASSY OF DENMARK, BANGLADESH
      • Energypac Limited Bangladesh
      • FAO- Bangladesh
      • FIVDB
      • ICDDRB, Mohakhali, Dhaka-1212
      • iDE Bangladesh
      • Innovision Consulting Private Ltd.
      • International Center for Climate Change and Development
      • International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development
      • International Development Research Centre
      • International Fertilizer Development Center, Bangladesh
      • International Food Policy Research Institute
      • International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre
      • International Potato Center
      • IRRI- Bangladesh
      • IRRI-Philippines
      • Ispahani Agro LTD
      • IUCN, Bangladesh
      • Krishi Gobeshina Foundation
      • Lal Teer
      • Mennonite Central Committee
      • Metal (Pvt.) Ltd
      • Modern Herbal Group
      • Palli Karma-Sahayak Foundation
      • Practical Action Bangladesh
      • Proshika
      • RDRS Bangladesh
      • RIRI-Philippines
      • Rothamsted Research
      • SAARC Agricultural Centre
      • SAARC Meteorological Research Centre
      • Social Upliftment Society
      • South Asia Enterprise Development Facility
      • Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
      • Supreme Seed
      • Transparency International Bangladesh
      • Unnayan Onneshan
      • USAID
      • Water Resources Planning Organization
      • Winrock International
      • World Bank
      • World Food Program
      • World Vegetable Center
      • WorldFish Centre, Bangladesh
    • Foreign University
      • Asian Institute of Technology
      • Auckland University of Technology
      • Australian National University
      • Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya
      • BOKU-University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences
      • Cranfield University
      • Curtin University
      • Foreign University/ Institute
      • Hiroshima University
      • Hokkaido University
      • Huazhong Agricultural University
      • International Islamic University, Malaysia
      • Kagawa University
      • Kangwon National University
      • Kochi University
      • Kyoto University
      • Kyushu University
      • Ladoke Akintola University of Technology
      • Murdoch University
      • Nagoya University
      • NOAA-CREST, CCNY
      • Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University
      • San Diego State University
      • Shinshu University
      • Tottori University
      • United Nations University
      • University Malaysia Kelantan
      • University Malaysia Pahang
      • University Nova de Lisboa
      • University of Alberta
      • University of Bremen
      • University of Bremen
      • University of Calgary
      • University of california
      • University of Greenwich
      • University of Hamburg, Hamburg
      • University of Hannover
      • University of Hawaii
      • University of Helsinki, Finland
      • University of Kalyani
      • University of Leeds
      • University of Liverpool
      • University of Malaya
      • University of Milan
      • University of New England
      • University of Philippines
      • University of Plymouth
      • University of Queensland
      • University of Reading
      • University of Southampton
      • University of Texas
      • University of the Punjab
      • University of Tokyo
      • University of Toronto
      • University of Wales
      • University of Washington
      • University of Wollongong
      • University Putra Malaysia
      • University Sains Malaysia
  • Search
    • Search by Keyword
    • Search by Organization
    • Search by Program Area
    • Search by Commodity/Non-commodity
    • Search by Funding Source
    • Search by Researcher
    • Custom Search
    • On-going Research
  • About Us
    • ARMIS
    • Brochure
  • Contact Us
    • BARC Personnel
    • ARMIS Personnel
    • Feedback
  • Report
    • All
    • By Organization
      • Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council
      • Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Forest Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture
      • Bangladesh Jute Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Rice Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Sericulture Research and Training Institute
      • Bangladesh Sugarcrop Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Tea Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute
      • Cotton Development Board
      • Soil Resource Development Institute
    • Research Trend Analysis
  • User Request
  • Data Input
  • Help
    • Operation Manual
      • PDF
      • Video
    • Program Area & Commodity
  • We have reached 37600 number of research entries at this moment.
    • Logout

Research Detail

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Detail
M. S. H. Chowdhury
Department of Forest Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shinshu University, 8304 Minamiminowa-Mura,Nagano-Ken 399-4598, Japan

S. Izumiyama
Department of Forest Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shinshu University, 8304 Minamiminowa-Mura,Nagano-Ken 399-4598, Japan

M. Koike
Department of Forest Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shinshu University, 8304 Minamiminowa-Mura,Nagano-Ken 399-4598, Japan

C. Gudmundsson
School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia

S. A. Mukul
School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia

N. Nazia
Department of Zoology, Noakhali Government College, Noakhali, Bangladesh

Md. P. Rana
School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, 80101 Joensuu, Finland

N. Muhammed
School of International Tropical Forestry, University Malaysia Sabah, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia

M. Redowan
Department of Forestry & Environmental Science, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet 3114, Bangladesh

The formulation of conservation policies with options for creating protected areas is significantly influenced by the social factors of the surrounding communities.Therefore, indigenous knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of the local communities need to be explored during the planning and implementation stages of conservation projects. A government-initiated experiment in co-management was conducted in the Rema-Kalenga Wildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh. This paper analyzes the attitudes toward conservation by members of local communities living in and around the wildlife sanctuary. Training incentives on alternative income-generating (AIG) activities and allotment of agricultural lands were distributed among the Forest User Groups. It is of interest to policy makers and resource managers whether this technique leads to improved attitudes on the part of local people. Although there were different attitudes toward protected areas and conservation,overall, a favorable attitude of the respondents was observed. The opinions of respondents also varied based on factors such as village position, village dependency level on forest resources, ethnicity and gender. Increase in annual income resulting from the augmented skills by trainings on AIG activities and getting agricultural lands leased from the Forest Department contributed significantly to the variation in respondents’ conservation attitudes. It is suggested that eliminating inequity and inequality in incentive distribution,discovering and launching training on more need-based livelihood activities, and liberalizing the restriction of resource extraction from the protected area by fixing the harvesting limit would encourage the community to be more cordially and actively involved in the conservation efforts of the sanctuary.

  Biodiversity conservation, Protected area, Stakeholders, Forest User Group, Bangladesh
  
  
  
  Socio-economic and Policy
  Attitude

This study was conducted among the local communities in and around Rema-KalengaWildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh, to analyze attitudes regarding various perceptions of forest conservation, community development and people’s participation in a co-management program

Study site Rema-Kalenga Wildlife Sanctuary  is situated in Gazipur and Ranigaon unions (small administrative unit of the local government) of Chunarughat upazila (sub-district) in Habigonj district, Bangladesh (BCAS2008). It is under the jurisdiction of Habigonj-2 Forest Range of Sylhet Forest Division located approximately 130 km east–northeast of the capital Dhaka and 80 km southeast of Sylhet city. The sanctuary is bounded by Tripura State of India to the south and east, the Kalenga Forest Range to the north and west, and tea estates to the southwest.Bioecologically it falls under the Sylhet Hills zones as part of the Tarap Hill Reserve Forest, of which 1,095 ha was first designated as wildlife sanctuary first in 1982 before being expanded further to 1,995 ha in 1996 under the Bangladesh Wildlife (Preservation) Order 1973. 

This was a micro-approach study, conducted among the members of the FUGs of  Rema-Kalenga Wildlife Sanctuary in the months of January and February 2009. Multi-stage partly random sampling was used in the study. A preliminary discussion was carried out at the Forest Range Office located in the sanctuary with the Forest Department officials,members of the Co-management Committee and local leaders of the community. The objective of the discussion was to provide information on the work intended, to collect an over all picture of the various stakeholders and forest-dependent local community and to select a village guide. An experienced middle-aged male was selected from the local community as to be the guide of the four-member research team. The team was headed by the first author and voluntarily assisted by the other three who were post-graduate students of the Department of Forestry and Environmental Science of Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh. The research assistants had the experience of community survey with background knowledge in forest–people relationship.Out of the 36 villages of varying degrees of dependency, five were selected from major stakeholders, two from medium, two from minor-medium and one from minor stake-holders, making a total of 10 villages. In terms of position, one village was inside the sanctuary, five were adjacent, and four were outside. These are Debrabari (inside-major stakeholder), Chanbari (adjacent-major stakeholder), Balumara (adjacent-major stake-holder), Kalengabari(adjacent-major stakeholder), Chakidarbari (adjacent-major stake-holder), Jamburachara (adjacent-medium stakeholder), Harinmara (outside-medium stakeholder), Himalia (outside-minor-medium stakeholder), Basulla (outside-minor-medium stakeholder) and Krishnanagar (outside-minor stakeholder). The village sizes ranged from 18 to 300 households; therefore, we sampled the cent percent households from the villages with major stakeholders and 15–20 % from the others. Out of 67 FUGs, we selected 25 groups at random, five of which had female members. Finally, a total of 302households were selected randomly for the study. An open-ended semi-structured questionnaire, pretested for the intelligibility in the local community, was used for the face-to-face interviews of the respondents. It was designed to gather information relating to various socioeconomic, demographic and cultural variables. Both the quantitative and qualitative data were collected during the study. Household heads (male 232, female 70) were the respondents and were assisted by other members of the family as necessary. In the family level, informal meetings were held in the interviewee’s home using the native language (Bangla), sometimes with the participation of more than one respondent together, every one being selected randomly. In addition, one focus group discussion was arranged in each village at the end of the survey. This was done to find the perception of the community and to cross-check the validity of opinions recorded during the interviews. The measurement of respondent attitudes about various conservation issues was assessed using a Likert scale (Likert1932). The Likert scale is a method of ascribing quantitative value to qualitative data, to make it amenable to statistical analysis. Likert scales usually have five potential choices (strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree) but sometimes go up to ten or more. A numerical value is assigned to each potential choice, and a mean figure for all the responses is computed at the end of the evaluation or survey. The final average score represents overall level of accomplishment or attitude toward the subject matter. Although this is mainly used in training course evaluations and market surveys, it has been widely used for assessing the community attitudes on natural resource management, protected and other conservation areas (e.g., Mehta and Heinen2001; Baral and Heinen2007; Rodela and Udovc2008; Pipinos and Fokiali 2009; Nicholas and Thapa2010). In our study, five choices with numerical values from 1(strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) were used. Attitude was defined using attitude theory (Ajzen and Fishbein1980) as human psychological tendencies expressed by evaluating a particular object with favor or disfavor, or, in this case, agree or disagree to the statements given. Data obtained were then organized and analyzed by using SPSS 15.

 
  Environ Dev Sustain (2014) 16:1235–1252
  DOI 10.1007/s10668-014-9524-y
Funding Source:
1.   Budget:  
  

In the study area, local communities expressed positive attitudes toward forest conservation efforts through protected areas. This study revealed the efficacy of co-management approach in strengthening the protected area system in Bangladesh. It was inferred that the efficacy becomes conspicuous when co-management program is launched with the pro-vision of need-based incentive packages. As the strategy of providing incentives, the Forest Department’s contemporary thoughtful initiative of AIG supports motivated local stake-holders to cooperate in carrying out the conservation programs. However, for the ultimate success in conserving the biological diversity, a pragmatic mission should be commenced on to diminish the defects prevailing in the whole system. In that connection, findings of the present study would be hint-worthy for the policy makers in forestry sector of Bangladesh and other countries with the similar biophysical and socioeconomic contexts.Therefore, the findings are envisioned for developing participatory action plans considering the community needs and thoughts toward livelihood development and biodiversity conservation. The state Forest Department may use the findings as tools for protected area management through active involvement of local communities, where their behavioral mindset would be reflected more realistically.

  Journal
  


Copyright © 2025. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council.