M. Alauddin Ahmed
MS Student
Department of Biotechnology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
Dr. Mirza Mofazzal Islam
Principal Scientific Officer
Plant Breeding Division and Head, Biotechnology Division, Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture,Bangladesh Agricultural University campusMymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
Dr. Shamsun Nahar begum
Senior Scientific Officer
Plant Breeding Division, Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture,Bangladesh Agricultural University campusMymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
J Halder
MS Student
Department of Biotechnology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
M H Ahmed
MS Student
Department of Biotechnology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
Rice, Salt tolerance, SSR Markers
Glass house and Biotechnology lab, Plant Breeding Division, BINA, Mymensingh
Variety and Species
Int. J. BioRes. 1 (1): 01-05, 2010.
Screening of F3 rice lines for salt tolerance at the seedling stage: Salt stress symptoms started to develop after two or three days of salinzation. Seedlings grown in salt stress showed several symptoms of salt injury like-yellowing of leaves, drying of leaves, and reduction in root growth, reduction of shoot growth and stem thickness and in many cases dying of seedlings. Overall, the seedling growth was suppressed under salinity stress. The observed plant population in the non-salinized condition showed normal seedling growth. The salinity injury symptoms like rolling, tip whitening and reduction in leaf area were the first symptoms. In salinized setup, F3 rice lines showed wide variation. Four lines were identified as salt tolerant, 5 moderately tolerant and 10 susceptible and rest of the lines was highly salt susceptible.
Screening of salt tolerance of 22 F3 rice lines using SSR markers: Primer RM18 tagged 11 lines (line 1, 7, 10, 15, 17, 18, 24, 33, 36, 40 and 43) tolerant and rest of lines were susceptible. Eight tolerant (line 4, 5, 9, 17, 20, 22, 40 and 43), 7 susceptible and 7 heterozygous lines were identified when F3 lines were genotyped with primer RM127. Primer RM 169 exhibited 6 tolerant (line 1, 4, 9, 17, 18 and 33), 11 susceptible and 5 heterozygous lines in comparison with parents Jangliboro and BRRI Dhan40.
Considering phenotypic and genotypic data, Line17 was tolerant against primers RM18, RM127 and RM169 and also shown salt tolerant under salt stress at the seedling stage. Likewise, line 8 and line 12 were found as susceptible against these markers while phenotypically these lines were susceptible and moderately tolerant under salt stress, respectively.
Journal