A total of 709 chicks obtained from a partial diallel cross involving RIR, WLH, FO, DN and DD chicken produced 75 RIR, 130 WLH, 100 FO, 70 DN, 66 DD, 80 RIR x DD, 80 WLH x DD and 108 FO x DD. The growth of eight genotypes in two replications were compared up to 18 weeks of age. At the beginning of 19 weeks the crossbred RIR x DD, WLH x DD and FO x DD cockerels and pullets were separated according to shank length (Raut et al., 1996). Among the crossbreds, both normal and dwarf offspring were found and thus 11 genetic groups; RIR, WLH, FO, DN, DD, RIR x DD normal, RIR x DD dwarf, WLH x DD normal, WLH x DD dwarf, FO x DD normal and FO x DD dwarf were obtained. At one day old, all chicks were individually weighed and wing banded, and brooded up to 4 weeks of age. They were housed, separated according to genotype, with a stocking density of 100 cm2/ bird. In growing phase, between one and 126 days of age, 709 chicks of eight different genotypes; RIR, WLH, FO, DN, DD, RIR x DD, WLH x DD and FO x DD had four replications for comparison between genotypes. Sawdust was used as litter with a depth of 7.5 cm during the first 4 weeks of age. Chick feeder and chick drinker were provided during the brooding period. The chicks were given a temperature of 35o C at first week of age, decreasing by 3oC per week up to 28 days of age. At day one and fortnightly, body weight, feed intake, and shank length were recorded. Shank lengths recorded are presented for day old, 4, 18 and 46 weeks of age. The shank length was measured as the distance between claw and hock joint. Feed conversion ratio (FCR) was calculated as feed intake per unit live weight gain. Mortality (%) was recorded daily. All birds were fed ad libitum on a starter diet (0-6 weeks) containing CP-20%, ME (Kcal/Kg)-2798, Ca-1.1%, P-0.5%, Lysine-1.1, Methionine + Cystine -0.8%, then a grower diet (7-8 weeks) containing CP 16.7%, ME (Kcal/Kg) 2700, Ca-1.2%, P-0.6%, Lysine-1.0%, Methionine + Cystine-0.7%. Statistical Analysis All data were for a completely Randomized Design and analysis of variance was performed to compare results between genotypes (Steel and Torrie, 1980) using MSTAT-C statistical computer package program (Russell, 1994). The significant variations of means were identified by Duncan’s New Multiple Range Test (DMRT).