Md. Monjurul Alam
Bangladesh Jute Research Institute
Syed Alauddin Ahmad,
Bangladesh Jute Research Institute
Sirajul Hoque
Bangladesh Jute Research Institute
Effect, Azospirillum,Nodulation,Lentil
BJRI,Manikganj,
Farming System
The experiment was conducted at the central jute research station of Bangladesh Jute Research Institute (BJRI), Manikganj, Bangladesh, during 2004 to 2007. In order to accomplish the objectives of this research work, some important cropping patterns, includingand/or excluding of jute, were used as treatments. The treatments (cropping patterns) w~re (T1) Potato - Jute - T. aman, (T2) Potato - B. aus - T. aman, (T3) Potato - Fallow - T. aman, and (T4) Fallow - Jute - T. aman, and the rate of applied nutrients for those treatment combinations were (T1) 160-30-120-20, 90-10-30-20, 90-20-40-15; (T2) 160-30-120-20, 60-20-35-15, 90-20-40-15; (T3) 160-30-120-20,00-00-00-00,90-20-40- 15; and (T4) 00-00-00-00, 90-10-30-20, 90-20-40-15 N-P-K-S kg/ha, correspondingly, as per Fertilizer Recommendation Guide of Bangladesh Agriculture Research Council (2). The varieties were Diamond, OM-I, BRRI Dhan-24, and BRRI Dhan-33 for potato, jute, B. aus, and T. arnan, respectively. Urea, triple supper phosphate (TSP), murate of potash (MP) and gypsum were used to provide nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulphur, in that order. Crop establishment and agronomic practices were performed as per recommendation 'made by BARI (3) for potato, BJRI (7) for jute and BRRI (9) for broadcast aus rice and transplanted aman rice. Plant samples {Root, stover and tuber of potato plant; Root, stick, leaf-l (defoliated during growing period), leaf-2 (with plant during harvest), and bark of jute plant; Root, straw and grain of B. aus rice and T. Aman rice plant were considered as different parts} were collected for each crop from the experimental field. Root samples were collected as outlined by Newman (22) and Karim et al. (18). Before setting the experiment and harvest of each crop/season soil samples were collected. Particle-size analysis (11); soil textural classes (19); soil bulk density and particle density (8); soil pH and soil organic carbon (17) of collected soil sample were performed. Total nitrogen (17); total P (21); total K (Flame Photometer, Gallenkemp); and total sulphur (15) of both soil and plant were measured. Collected data were analyzed by using MST A T, a software for statistical analyses (20). Removals of nitrogen (N) by the different plant parts of individual crop were measured by using dry matter production and N concentrations values. Balance sheets of N were prepared after each crop season as affected by treatments as the difference between the nitrogen inputs (soil status plus applied as fertilizers and/or from crop residue) and outputs (uptake by crop plants). Nitrogen- balance methodologies used the sum of all inputs minus the sum of all outputs with unaccounted gain or loss.
Bangladesh J. Jute Fib. Res. 2009, 29(1-2): 83-93
Journal