Muhammad Ali Akond
Department of Botany, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka-1342, Bangladesh
Saidul Alam
Department of Botany, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka-1342, Bangladesh
S. M. R. Hassan
Department of Botany, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka-1342, Bangladesh
Md. Mahbubur Rahman
Laboratory Sciences Division, icddr,b, Dhaka-1212, Bangladesh
Mozammel Hoq
Department of Microbiology, University of Dhaka,Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh
Momena Shirin
Institute of Public Health, Mohakhali, Dhaka-1212,Bangladesh
Salmonella spp.; drug resistance; poultry environments
Department of Botany, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka-1342, Bangladesh
Food Safety and Security
Sampling Area and Sample Collection. The study was carried out during the period from October, 2008 to June, 2010. Three hundred samples from cloacal swabs of chicken (n = 80), intestinal fluid of chicken (n=70), egg surface (n = 60), soil of chicken market (n=40) and hand wash of chicken handlers (n=50) were collected from various poultry shops of 4 City Corporation markets viz., Mohakhali, Dhaka New Market, Mirpur and Malibag of the Dhaka metropolitan city. The samples were collected following the procedure. Transportation of Sample. All the samples were transported to the laboratory immediately after collection in an insulating foam box with ice maintaining the temperature ranging from 40C to 60C. In case of the cloacal swab samples, the test tubes containing selenite broth were incubated for 6 hours at 370C immediately after coming to the laboratory for the enrichment of the Salmonella spp. Isolation of Salmonella spp. Serial dilutions up to 10–3 were made for soil sample. 0.1 ml of sample from intestinal fluid, 0.2 ml of sample prepared from soil of chicken market (dilution up to 10–3) and a loopfull of selective selenite broth from previously incubated cloacal swab sample were spread on the solid surface of Salmonella-Shigella (SS) agar medium (Hi-Media, India). A total of 1.0 ml sample from intestinal fluid and soil of chicken market was placed onto sterile plates which was then mixed with sterile medium poured into the plates after being cooled to about 42-450C. About 10-100 ml of water sample from egg surface and hand wash of chicken handlers was filtrated through the membrane filter (0.45 μm, Millipore) to isolate the organism. The membrane filter was then placed on the surface of Salmonella-Shigella (SS) agar medium. Replications of all samples using triplicate plates were tested for successful isolation of typical colonies by incubating them at 370C for 24 hours. Biochemical Identification and Serotyping of Salmonella spp. A total of 150 strains were subjected for biochemical identification including Gram staining, urease test, catalase test, oxidase test, H2S production test, lactose utilization test, indole test, Voges-Proskauer test and citrate utilization test. Moreover, Salmonella serotyping was determined by latex agglutination tests using polyvalent antisera (Denka Seiken Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan), according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The presumptive Salmonella isolates were mixed with the latex test reagent and was observed for the agglutination reaction to check the presence of Salmonella. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test. A total of 100 selected Salmonella strains, recovered from cloacal swab, intestinal fluid, handwash of chicken handler, egg surface and soil sample from chicken market, were tested for resistance against antimicrobial agents by Kirby-Bauer method using Mueller-Hinton agar plates. The standard procedure of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) were strictly followed throughout the testing procedure. Quality control strain Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was included in each run. All Salmonella isolates were subjected against 14 commercial antibiotic discs (Becton Dickinson Antibiotic Disc, U.S.A.) of streptomycin (10 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (10 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), penicillin (10 μg), norfloxacin (10 μg), cephalexin (15 μg), riphampicin (5 μg), cefixine (5 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg) and gentamicin (10 μg). The isolates were categorized as susceptible, intermediate and resistant according to the zone diameter interpretative standards recommendations by CLSI.
Stamford Journal of Microbiology, December 2012. Vol. 2, Issue 1; ISSN: 2074-5346
Journal