Mostafa A. R. Hossain
Faculty of Fisheries, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh
Paul G. Olin
Sea Grant Extension Program, University of California, Davis Cooperative Extension, 133 Aviation Blvd., Suite 109, Santa Rosa, California 95403, USA
M. Abdul Wahab
Faculty of Fisheries, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh
M. Ekram Azim
Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, Ontario M1C 1A4, Canada
M. Abu Sayeed
Faculty of Fisheries, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh
M. Nahiduzzaman
Faculty of Fisheries, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh
Chalan beel, Fish biodiversity, Gear efficiency, Management strategies.
Natore, Pabna, Sirajgonj
Conservation and Biodiversity
Aquatic animal
Field works were undertaken in each of the 10 upazilas over which the Chalan beel spread in 2005 and 2006 – ?Singra, Gurudaspur, Boraigram, Chatmohar, Bhangura, Faridpur, Shahjadpur, Ullapara, Tarash, and Raigonj, in three districts (Natore, Pabna, Sirajgonj). Data were collected from (i) interviews and focus group discussions with primary and secondary stakeholders; (ii) direct sampling; and (iii) secondary literature. Semistructured and structured questionnaires were developed, pretested and adapted prior to the survey proper. Key issues addressed included; (i) present status of the various habitats under Chalan beel; (ii) fish biodiversity; and (iii) causes of habitat and biodiversity degradation and their possible mitigation measures. The stakeholders: A total of 185 stakeholders, including fishers, fish farmers, upazila fisheries officers, local leaders, school teachers and housewives, participated in this study. Ten focus group discussions were conducted in 10 upazilas of Chalan beel area. The characteristics of the stakeholder, including the nature of any primary dependency on the beel. Fish catch sampling: Three rivers are known to be the main sources of the capture fishery in the Chalan beel: (i) Gumani river at Gurudaspur Upazila (Natore district); (ii) Baral River at Chatmohar Upazila (Pabna District); and (iii) Katagang River at Tarash Upazila (Sirajgonj District). These three rivers were selected for sampling. Set bag nets (Suti jal) were deployed to capture all types and sizes of fish, with minimum selectivity, in order to assess species composition. Sampling was performed twice a month during the main fishing season (October to November) in 2005 and 2006, with each sample performed in triplicate. When possible, fish were identified, counted, weighed and then released onsite. Otherwise, they were preserved in 10% formalin in plastic jars for laboratory assessment. The collected fish were identified. In order to estimate fishing gear efficiencies, in addition to the set bag net, the fish sampling also was conducted with four other commonly used gears, including (i) seine net; (ii) gill net; (iii) cast net and (iv) fish traps. Each of these five gears was sampled in triplicate at the same sample sites described above, although only monthly during July to December in 2005 and 2006. The results were triangulated against other available secondary data sources, namely, the Department of Fisheries reports, although non-government organization reports, scientific journal articles and other published reports and materials also were consulted. Statistical analysis: In order to estimate the interannual catch changes of the most abundant species, the catch coefficient of variation within each year (CVw = 100 Sm/Xm, where Xm and Sm are the mean and standard deviation of monthly abundance, respectively), and among years (CVa = 100 Sa/Xa, where Xa and Sa are mean and standard deviation of annual abundance, respectively), were calculated. Frequency counts for the most abundant species were subjected to analyses of variance (ANOVA) in order to assess potential differences between the three sample sites, 2 years and fishing months. Factors were tested with the general linear model (GLM) for analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a 0.05 significance level. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS (windows version 11.5) software package.
Lakes & Reservoirs: Research and Management 2009; 14: 3–19
Journal