Md. Ilias Hossain*
Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Bangladesh.
Md. Jahedul Islam
Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Bangladesh.
M.R.I Mondal
Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Bangladesh.
M. A. Hakim
Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Bangladesh.
Gathala. Mahesh
CIMMYT, Bangladesh.
Raised bed, Cropping systems, Productivity, Sustainable and Drought.
Regional Wheat Research Centre, Shyampur, Rajshahi, Bangladesh
Risk Management in Agriculture
Land development productivity
A cool season wheat (Triticum aestivum)-spring mungbean (Vigna radiata)-monsoon rice (Oryza sativa) cropping pattern was implemented over 8 years, starting with wheat sown in November 25, 2004, at the Regional Wheat Research Centre, Shyampur, Rajshahi, Bangladesh. Total rainfall was highest during the mungbean season and lowest in the wheat season in all years. The trial involved a three-crop (rice-wheat-mungbean (RWM) annual rotation planted on raised beds and cultivated flats. Rice was transplanted (one 25-days-old seedling per hill) with hill-to-hill spacing of 15 cm and line-to-line spacing on the beds of 30 cm in late July and harvested in late November by hand. Wheat was planted at the nationally recommended seeding rate of 100 and 120 kg/ha for beds and conventional, respectively, in late November and harvested in late March. After harvest of wheat, mungbean (Vigna radiata) was planted at the same time at the nationally recommended seeding rate of 35 kg/ha for mungbean in early April and harvested in mid July for both beds and conventional layout. The trial was originally established as a PRB experiment with two straw management practices (main plots-30% straw retention (SR) and 0% SR) and five N levels (subplots 0, 40, 80, 100 and 120% of recommended). The area of each subplot was 15 m2 (5m x 3m). The experiment consisted of 20 subplots with four tillage or straw treatments (30% SR + PRB, 30% SR + CTP, 0% SR + PRB and 0% SR + CTP) and five N levels (0, 40, 80, 100 and 120% recommended) with three replicates. After planting the wheat or rice, straw from the preceding cereal crop was returned as mulch into the plot from which it had been removed at harvest. After harvesting and threshing, the rice and wheat straw were returned without chopping as standing way. The width of the beds was 60 cm (furrow to furrow) and the depth of the furrows on average was 15 cm. Two rows of wheat (var. Shatabdi) or rice (var. BRRI dhan49) with a spacing of 30 cm, were planted by hand sowing on the beds, two rows of rice on the beds, Mungbean (var. BARI Mungbean-6) was sown by bed former in the furrows between the beds and indicator plant to assess microbial activity in the soil environment. The mungbean was harvested about 60 days after sowing (DAS). In CTP, wheat, rice and mungbean were planted in 20 cm, 30 x 15 cm (row x plant) and 30 cm rows, respectively. A basal dose of P (20, 22 and 26 kg/ha) from triple super phosphate, K (15, 35 and 33 kg/ha) from muriate of potash and S (10, 11 and 20 kg/ha) from gypsum was applied to mungbean, rice and wheat, respectively. In rice the entire amount of PKS was broadcast before transplanting and mulching on both PRB and CTP. For CTP the fertilizer was broadcast before tillage as is the usual practice. The recommended rate of N (80 kg/ha for rice, 100 kg/ha for wheat and 20 kg/ha for mungbean) was applied as urea. For mungbean all N was applied before seeding. With CTP, N was broadcast, while with beds it was banded on top of the soil between two rows in three equal installments 15, 30 and 45 days after transplanting. With wheat, two-thirds of the N was applied before seeding and the remaining one-third at crown root initiation (CRI).
Statistical analysis of data: Microsoft Excel and DMRT were used to determine the significant difference between treatments. Simple correlation was determined following the computer package SPSS. Treatment means were compared using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT) at P ≤ 0.05. Multiple Range Test (DMRT) (Gomez and Gomez, 1984). The data were analyzed statistically following computer package MSTAT- All the data were statistically analyzed following the ANOVA technique and the significance of mean differences was adjusted by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test
Journal of Dynamics in Agricultural Research Vol. 1(5), pp.44-52, December 2014
Journal