Agricultural Research Management Information System

  • Home
  • Research Summary
    • All
    • Government Organization
      • Agriculture Training Institute, Ishwardi, Pabna
      • Bangabandhu academy for poverty alleviation and rural development (BAPARD)
      • Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science & Technology University
      • Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics
      • Bangladesh Institute of Health Sciences
      • Bangladesh Institute of Tropical & Infections Diseases (BITID)
      • Bangladesh Meteorological Department
      • Bangladesh National Herbarium
      • Bangladesh Space Research and Remote Sensing Organization
      • Bangladesh Technical Educational Board
      • Barind Multipurpose Development Authority
      • Central Cattle Breeding Station
      • Department of Agriculture Extension
      • Department of Fisheries
      • Department of Livestock Services
      • Department of Youth Development
      • Dhaka Medical College
      • Geological Survey of Bangladesh
      • Institute of Epidemiology, Disease Control & Research
      • Jatiya Kabi Kazi Nazrul Islam University
      • Khulna Govt. Women College
      • Livestock Training Institute
      • Local Government Engineering Department
      • Ministry of Agriculture
      • Ministry of Environment and forest
      • Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock
      • Ministry of Labour & Employement
      • Ministry of Land
      • Ministry of Public Administration
      • Ministry of Textiles and Jute
      • Ministry of Water Resources
      • Ministry of Youth and Sports
      • National Agricultural Training Academy
      • National institute of preventive and social medicine
      • National Mushroom Development and Extension Centre
      • Pabna University of Science and Technology
      • Seed Certification Agency
      • Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College
      • Sheikh Hasina University
      • University Grants Commission
      • Youth Training Centre
    • Autonomous/Semi-gov Org
      • Bangladesh Academy for Rural Development
      • Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation
      • Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission
      • Bangladesh Council of Scientific and Industrial Research
      • Bangladesh Fisheries Development Corporation
      • Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies
      • Bangladesh Institute of Management
      • Bangladesh Milk Producers Cooperative Union Limited
      • Bangladesh Water Development Board
      • BIRDEM
      • Center for Environmental and Geographic Information Services
      • Hortex Foundation
      • Institute of Water Modeling
      • National Institute of Biotechnology
      • River Research Institute
      • Rural Development Academy
    • NARS
      • Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council
      • Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Forest Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture
      • Bangladesh Jute Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Rice Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Sericulture Research and Training Institute
      • Bangladesh Sugarcrop Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Tea Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute
      • Cotton Development Board
      • Soil Resource Development Institute
    • Public University
      • Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology
      • Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University
      • Bangamata Sheikh Fojilatunnesa Mujib Science and Technology University
      • Bangladesh Agricultural University
      • Bangladesh Open University
      • Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology
      • Bangladesh University of Professionals
      • Bangladesh University of Textiles
      • Barisal Government Veterinary College
      • Begum Rokeya University
      • Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology
      • Chittagong Veterinary and Animal Science University
      • Comilla University
      • Dhaka University of Engineering & Technology
      • Dinajpur Government Veterinary College, Dinajpur
      • Gono Bishwabidyalay
      • Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University
      • Islamic University, Kushtia
      • Jagannath University
      • Jahangirnagar University
      • Jessore University of Science and Technology
      • Jhenaidha Government Veterinary College
      • Khulna Agricultural University
      • Khulna University
      • Khulna University of Engineering & Technology
      • Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University
      • Millitary Institute of Science and Technology
      • National University
      • Noakhali Science and Technology University
      • Patuakhali Science and Technology University
      • Rajshahi University of Engineering and Technology
      • Shahjalal University of Science & Technology
      • Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University
      • Sylhet Agricultural University
      • Sylhet Government Veterinary College
      • University of Barisal
      • University of Chittagong
      • University of Dhaka
      • University of Rajshahi
    • Private University
      • Asian University of Bangladesh
      • Atish Dipankar University of Science and Technology
      • BGC Trust University Bangladesh
      • BGMEA University of Fashion & Technology (BUFT)
      • BRAC University
      • City University
      • Daffodil International University
      • East West University
      • Exim Bank Agricultural University
      • Gana Bishwabiddalaya
      • Hamdard University
      • Independent University, Bangladesh
      • International Islamic University Chittagong
      • International University of Business Agriculture and Technology
      • Islamic University of Technology
      • Leading University, Sylhet
      • North South University
      • Premier University
      • Primeasia University
      • Private University
      • SOAS, University of London
      • Southeast University
      • Stamford University
      • State University of Bangladesh
      • The Millenium University
      • University of Asia Pacific
      • University of Development Alternative
      • University of Information Technology and Sciences
      • University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh
      • University of Science and Technology, Chittagong
      • World University
    • INGO/IO/NGO/Private Org
      • ACI Limited
      • Agricultural Advisory Society (AAS)
      • Apex Organic Industries Limited
      • Arannayk Foundation
      • Bangladesh Academy of Sciences
      • Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies
      • Bangladesh Institute of Social Research
      • Bangladesh Science Foundation
      • Bangladesh Unnayan Parishad
      • BAPA
      • BRAC
      • CARE Bangladesh
      • CARITAS
      • Centre for Environmental Geographical Information System
      • Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD)
      • Creative Conservation Alliance
      • Dhaka Ahsania Mission
      • Dwip Unnayan Sangstha
      • EMBASSY OF DENMARK, BANGLADESH
      • Energypac Limited Bangladesh
      • FAO- Bangladesh
      • FIVDB
      • ICDDRB, Mohakhali, Dhaka-1212
      • iDE Bangladesh
      • Innovision Consulting Private Ltd.
      • International Center for Climate Change and Development
      • International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development
      • International Development Research Centre
      • International Fertilizer Development Center, Bangladesh
      • International Food Policy Research Institute
      • International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre
      • International Potato Center
      • IRRI- Bangladesh
      • IRRI-Philippines
      • Ispahani Agro LTD
      • IUCN, Bangladesh
      • Krishi Gobeshina Foundation
      • Lal Teer
      • Mennonite Central Committee
      • Metal (Pvt.) Ltd
      • Modern Herbal Group
      • Palli Karma-Sahayak Foundation
      • Practical Action Bangladesh
      • Proshika
      • RDRS Bangladesh
      • RIRI-Philippines
      • Rothamsted Research
      • SAARC Agricultural Centre
      • SAARC Meteorological Research Centre
      • Social Upliftment Society
      • South Asia Enterprise Development Facility
      • Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
      • Supreme Seed
      • Transparency International Bangladesh
      • Unnayan Onneshan
      • USAID
      • Water Resources Planning Organization
      • Winrock International
      • World Bank
      • World Food Program
      • World Vegetable Center
      • WorldFish Centre, Bangladesh
    • Foreign University
      • Asian Institute of Technology
      • Auckland University of Technology
      • Australian National University
      • Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya
      • BOKU-University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences
      • Cranfield University
      • Curtin University
      • Foreign University/ Institute
      • Hiroshima University
      • Hokkaido University
      • Huazhong Agricultural University
      • International Islamic University, Malaysia
      • Kagawa University
      • Kangwon National University
      • Kochi University
      • Kyoto University
      • Kyushu University
      • Ladoke Akintola University of Technology
      • Murdoch University
      • Nagoya University
      • NOAA-CREST, CCNY
      • Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University
      • San Diego State University
      • Shinshu University
      • Tottori University
      • United Nations University
      • University Malaysia Kelantan
      • University Malaysia Pahang
      • University Nova de Lisboa
      • University of Alberta
      • University of Bremen
      • University of Bremen
      • University of Calgary
      • University of california
      • University of Greenwich
      • University of Hamburg, Hamburg
      • University of Hannover
      • University of Hawaii
      • University of Helsinki, Finland
      • University of Kalyani
      • University of Leeds
      • University of Liverpool
      • University of Malaya
      • University of Milan
      • University of New England
      • University of Philippines
      • University of Plymouth
      • University of Queensland
      • University of Reading
      • University of Southampton
      • University of Texas
      • University of the Punjab
      • University of Tokyo
      • University of Toronto
      • University of Wales
      • University of Washington
      • University of Wollongong
      • University Putra Malaysia
      • University Sains Malaysia
  • Search
    • Search by Keyword
    • Search by Organization
    • Search by Program Area
    • Search by Commodity/Non-commodity
    • Search by Funding Source
    • Search by Researcher
    • Custom Search
    • On-going Research
  • About Us
    • ARMIS
    • Brochure
  • Contact Us
    • BARC Personnel
    • ARMIS Personnel
    • Feedback
  • Report
    • All
    • By Organization
      • Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council
      • Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Forest Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture
      • Bangladesh Jute Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Rice Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Sericulture Research and Training Institute
      • Bangladesh Sugarcrop Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Tea Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute
      • Cotton Development Board
      • Soil Resource Development Institute
    • Research Trend Analysis
  • User Request
  • Data Input
  • Help
    • Operation Manual
      • PDF
      • Video
    • Program Area & Commodity
  • We have reached 37600 number of research entries at this moment.
    • Logout

Research Detail

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Detail
Balcombe, Kelvin
Department of Agricultural and Food Economics University of Reading

Fraser, Iain Mcpherson
Applied Economics and Business Management Kent Business School University of Kent

Latruffe, Laure
INRA-Unité ESR Rennes

Rahman, Mizanur
Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Gazipur 1701, Bangladesh

Smith, Laurence
Centre for Environmental Policy Imperial College, London

In this paper we examine sources of technical efficiency for rice farming in Bangladesh. The motivation for the analysis is the need to close the rice yield gap to enable food security. We employ the DEA double bootstrap of Simar and Wilson (2006) to estimate and explain technical efficiency. This technique overcomes severe limitations inherent in using the two-stage DEA approach commonly employed in the efficiency literature. From a policy perspective our results show that potential efficiency gains to reduce the yield gap are greater than previously found. Statistically positive influences on technical efficiency are education, extension and credit, with age being a negative influence. 

  DEA, Double bootstrap, Bangladesh, Rice Farms
  
  
  
  Socio-economic and Policy
  Efficiency

The structure of our paper is as follows. In Section 2 we explain and detail the double bootstrap methodology of Simar and Wilson (2006) that we employ this paper. Next we detail our farm survey instrument and sample data. Section 4 we present our results. Finally, in Section 5 we provide a summary and conclusions.

A recent methodological development by Simar and Wilson (2006) identifies serious limitations with the two-step DEA approach. They argue that the two-step procedure takes no account of the underlying data-generating process (DGP), casting doubt statistically on the meaning of the estimates produced to explain technical efficiency. Simar and Wilson argue that DEA efficiency estimates are serially correlated. As such standard inference approaches used in the conventional two-step DEA procedure are statistically invalid. These limitations lead them to develop the double bootstrap procedure that enables consistent inference within DEA models estimating and explaining efficiency scores, while simultaneously producing standard errors and confidence intervals for these efficiency scores.  In this paper we employ the Simar and Wilson (2006) DEA double bootstrap procedure to estimate and explain technical efficiency for a sample of Bangladesh rice farms. The rationale for estimating the degree of technical inefficiency in Bangladesh farming can be traced to the apparent large gap between experiment stations’ and highest ‘profit maximising’ yields achievable on farms. In the efficiency literature shortfalls in yields relative to best practice are commonly attributed to socio-economic and institutional constraints and deficiencies in the management practices of farmers (De Datta et al., 1978). These reasons are frequently characterised by several stylised facts. First, rice producers are relatively older people with minimal formal education and limited extension service support, and assumed to be conservative and less receptive to new technology and practices. Second, farm size is very small and fragmented and much of the land is not cultivated by owners but by tenants with fewer resources and lower incentives for investment. Third, working capital in the form of credit is limited in availability. Four, much of the rice seed used is of poor quality and too infrequently replaced. Finally, many farmers are diverted from attention to farming by engagement in off-farm activities. These stylised facts suggest a potentially short term and practical solution of narrowing the yield gap by improving farm level efficiency and as such merit investigation and attention. Our analysis adds to the literature that examines the efficiency of rice farming generally (e.g., Thiam et al., 2001) and in Bangladesh specifically (e.g., Banik, 1994; Sharif and Dar, 1996a,b; Wadud and White, 2000; Coelli et al., 2002; Wadud, 2003). Average DEA estimates of technical efficiency in the Bangladesh literature range between 0.66 (Coelli et al., 2002) and 0.91 (Wadud, 2003). Although all the studies indicate that there is a degree of technical inefficiency, the relative levels of technical inefficiency are not all markedly lower than those typically reported in studies of developed economy agriculture. Based on these results, the potential to close the yield gap may be less than anticipated. However, we need to be careful when attempting to draw broad policy implications from a specific set of related but independent studies. First, all estimates of technical efficiency are sample specific. This is then compounded by the fact that sample size and number of variables included in model specifications impact the estimates (Zhang and Bartels, 1998). In addition, it is now understood that DEA yields biased estimates of efficiency. Simar and Wilson (2000) explain that traditional DEA methods will yield sample estimates efficiency that will positively exaggerate the level of efficiency within a sample of data. By employing the double bootstrap DEA approach of Simar and Wilson (2006) we are able to report bias corrected estimates of technical efficiency. As a result of estimating the bias corrected measures of technical efficiency our results can be viewed by policy makers with increased confidence.

  Applied Economics, 40(15), 1919-1925.
  https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840600905282
Funding Source:
1.   Budget:  
  

First, this study has revealed that there is substantial room for improvements in technical efficiency in the sample of farms analysed. The potential improvement, albeit difficult to directly compare with existing estimates in the literature, is almost certainly bigger than previous research has revealed using DEA. Indeed it would be interesting to investigate the extent to which previous estimates of technical efficiency would need to be revised. As a result improvements in technical efficiency amongst these farmers can help to reduce the existing yield gap between the most and the least efficient farmers. Second, the analysis revealed factors that enhance technical efficiency to be education, extension services, owner-operated farms, availability of credit and bigger farms. Although these factors had been identified in earlier research we can, as a result of the methods employed in this paper, feel very secure in presenting these findings. Similarly, we have identified that age and off-farm activity as being negatively related to technical efficiency. The results reported here suggest that access to technical information and to credit, are the leading constraints to improved productivity in Bangladesh rice farming. Also that attempts to alleviate these constraints are likely to be more effective when targeted at younger and better-educated farmers or perhaps farm family members. Finally, it can be stressed once again that the developments in DEA methodology examined in this paper have been applied by only very few researchers to date. There is clearly a need for greater adoption and consideration of the methods employed here to provide increased insight into their potential. Although our findings do not contradict previous studies, it is advisable to use the Simar and Wilson (2006) double bootstrap procedure in further applied research on technical efficiency, as it can increase the confidence that policy makers can place on results generated. 

  Journal
  


Copyright © 2025. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council.