Tapan Kumar Nath
School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Selangor, Malaysia
Mohammed Jashimuddin
Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh
Md. Kamruzzaman
Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh
Vaskar Mazumder
Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh
Md. Kamrul Hasan
Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh
Sukumar Das
Divisional officer (retired), Bangladesh Forest Research Institute, Chittagong
Panchannon Kumar Dhali
German Development Cooperation, Bangladesh
Diversity index, Tree density, Basal area, Co-management, Livelihood, Forest conservation.
Conservation and Biodiversity
Data collection for this research was conducted through vegetation survey, key-informants interview and focus group discussion, and carried out between July to December 2011. Key-informants Interviews and Focus Group Discussion Key-informant interviews were conducted with FD staff members including forest rangers, beat officers and guards, and sought their opinions on the co-management approach and its impact on forest management. A total of 15 focus group discussions, eight with community patrol groups (CPG) members, three with village conservation forums (VCF) members, three with local people (who are not CPG or VCF members) and one with co-management committee (CMC) members were held. Group discussions highlighted villagers’ opinion on impact of co-management on forest conservation, their involvement on forest conservation and enhancement of livelihoods due to co-management. A checklist was used to facilitate the discussion. Forest Vegetation Survey For the vegetation survey, stratified and systematic sampling was followed. The CWS consists of seven forest beats and each of them was treated as a strata. In total 140 circular plots (17.84 m radius), 20 in each beat were laid out. Circular plots are commonly used in vegetation studies, easy to establish, minimize error due to edge effects, provide relatively accurate and time efficient results on small stems (Sparks et al., 2002; Gage & Cooper, 2010). For locating plots, a base map of every beat was copied on tracing paper, with a point on each map near a permanent feature selected. Four or five equidistant parallel lines were then drawn on each map and 20 equidistant plots were marked on the lines. After identifying the point physically on ground, the first plot on the first line was selected by using a compass and a GPS (global positioning system) device (Garmin - GPSmap76Cx). The coordinates of the center points of each plot were recorded. Distance from plot to plot and line to line was measured based on base map scale and then located using the GPS. By using Google Earth Map the coordinates of all plots were laid out on respective beats of the CWS (Figure 1). For the regeneration study 140 co-centric plots, each with 1.25 m radius were laid out in seven beats. A field data collection format consisting of name of forest range and beat, geographical coordinates, tree species name, diameter at breast height (dbh), number of recently felled stumps, name and number of each regenerating tree species was used. All trees having dbh at least 5cm in each plot were counted species wise and the dbh were recorded. The number of recently felled stumps was counted. For regeneration, the numbers of seedlings (up to 1m in height) and saplings (1-2.5m in height) were counted for each species. Common tree species were identified directly in the field with help from local people and forest department staff. For unidentified tree species, plant parts (twigs, flowers and fruits) were collected and preserved in a herbarium, and later identified by a plant taxonomist in the Department of Botany, University of Chittagong, Data Processing and Analysis The phytosociological characteristics of tress including the species density, relative density (RD), frequency, relative frequency (RF), relative dominance (RDo), abundance, relative abundance (RA) and importance value index (IVI) of each species were calculated using formulae given by Moore & Chapman (1986). The IVI for regeneration was calculated as sum of RD, RF and RA whereas IVI for tree species was the sum of RD, RF and RDo. Several diversity indices (including Shannon-Wiener’s diversity index, Evenness index, Richness index, Index of dominance, and Disturbance index) were determined. The Shannon-Weiner diversity index (H) was calculated according to Shannon & Weiner (1963): H= -∑ (ni/N) x Ln (ni/N) where ni= Number of individuals of one species in a site N= total number of individuals of all species in a site .
Journal of Sustainable Forestry ISSN: 1054-9811 (Print) 1540-756X (Online) Journal homepage:
Journal