Md. Khirul Islam
Pharmacy Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna-9208, Bangladesh
Sanjib Saha
Pharmacy Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna-9208, Bangladesh
Imran Mahmud
Pharmacy Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna-9208, Bangladesh
Khalit Mohamad
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Khalijah Awang
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Shaikh Jamal Uddin
School of Medical Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast campus, Queensland, Australia
Md. Mustafizur Rahman
Pharmacy Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna-9208, Bangladesh
Jamil A. Shilpi
Pharmacy Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna-9208, Bangladesh
Indigenous knowledge, Traditional health practitioners, Garo tribe, Use value Informant consensus factor, Fidelity level
Madhupur forest area, Bangladesh
Development of Host and Medicinal Plants
Medicinal Plants
2.1. Study area Madhupur Forest is situated at the central part of Bangladesh and offers dense vegetation due to its tropical moist climate. Geographically, Madhupur forest. It is situated almost 50 km south of the Garo Hills and about 151 km north of Dhaka, the capital of Bangladesh. The forest is about 20 m above the mean sea level. The Madhupur forest, also known as ‘Madhupur Garh’, is elevated about 1–2 m in height over the surrounding plains. The forest is somewhere partly thin, partly dense and has scrub jungles also. To prevent further deforestation, it has been declared a reserved forest which covers an area of 44,292.40 acres. Administratively, total Madhupur area is distributed into 5 Ranges and 10 Beats. Geographically, Madhupur forest is situated in the centre of the Ganges–Brahmaputra Meghna delta. The soil is yellowish-red, sandy clay mixed and compact but melts with the rainfall and becomes tenacious and soft. Bangshai River on the west and the Banar River on the east are the main rivers around the forest. The area has a monsoon climate typical for the Indian Subcontinent. Average annual rainfall is 2650 mm. Maximum and minimum annual temperature is 33.8 and 11.6 1C, respectively. Annual relative humidity ranges between 22.8% (average minimum) and 97.4% (average maximum). According to an unpublished data collected by a joint study of Bangladesh Space Research and Remote Sensing Organisation (SPARSO) and the Department of Forest in 2007, the unique flora and fauna of Madhupur forest area has reduced by 85% in the last 40 years (The Daily Star, 2013). The forest area faces further reduction in size in coming years due to increased human activities (Banglapedia, 2003). 2.2. Sampling of informants The study was conducted from September 2011 to December 2012 following the standard protocols for the collection of ethnobotanical data (Alexiades, 1996; Martin, 2004). Permission to perform ethnomedicinal survey in Madhupur forest area was given by the authority of Tangail Forest Division. Information was collected from local traditional health practitioners (Kabiraj/ Ayurved/Hakim/Unani/independent healer/other), indigenous and tribal (Garo, Koch and Hajong communities) people with practical knowledge on the use of medicinal plants for various remedies. Fieldwork comprised of interviewing a total of 210 people which include participants from aforementioned categories. A good proportion of the respondents were from the Garo, the most abundant and one of the most ancient tribes of Madhupur region. 2.3. Ethnomedicinal data collection The purpose of the fieldwork was explained to healers, in particular that the sole purpose of the survey had no other intention except the documentation of their medicinal plant usage. Knowledge in local language of the first author of this article was considered as an added advantage for interviewing tribal people. The survey was conducted through semi-structured, open-ended interviews (Martin, 1995). The questionnaire was designed to address the following information of plants used in ethnobotanical practice: local name, source, used plant part(s), preparation method, and relative abundance of the plant in study area. Social bio-data of the participants such as age, class, gender, experience, and educational background were also recorded. 2.4. Plant identification and herbaria Upon identification of the plant under scrutiny by the interviewee, samples were collected for the preparation of voucher specimen. For some samples, voucher specimens were prepared at later stages when the trees were in bloom or having fruits. The voucher specimens were submitted to Bangladesh National Herbarium and were identified by the experts. 2.5. Data analysis The information was arranged in alphabetical order of the scientific names of the plants along with the family, local name, used plant parts, mode of application, and mode of preparation, habit, habitat and name of the diseases they are indicated for. The results were further analysed and presented on the basis of their use and disease categories. 2.5.1. Use value (UV) Use values (UV) are calculated for individual plants to give a quantitative measure of its relative importance to the informants objectively (Phillips et al., 1994). Use value was calculated by the equation: UVs 1/4 ΣiUVis=ns where ‘UVs’ refers to the use value of a species, ‘UVis’ refers to the number of use reports cited by the informants for that plant species and ‘ns’ refers to the total number of informants interviewed. Generally UV is calculated to determine the extent of medicinal use for a given plant species. Plant with broad therapeutic uses or those that are widely accepted for the cure of a particular ailment will score a high UV. 2.5.2. Informant consensus factor (ICF) Informant consensus factor (ICF) was calculated to determine the homogeneity of the information for a particular plant to treat a particular ailment (Heinrich et al., 1998; Canales et al., 2005). ICF values ranges from 0.00 to 1.00. High ICF value (approaching 1) of an ailment category is obtained when one or a few plant species are documented to be used for the treatment of that ailment by a large proportion of the informants, whereas a low ICF value indicates that informants disagree over which plant to use. ICF is calculated using the following formula: ICF ¼ ðNur NtÞ=ðNur 1Þ where ‘Nur’ refers to the total number of use reports for a particular illness category, and ‘Nt’ refers to the total number of species used for this illness category. In order to apply the above parameter, several diseases are placed into broad ailment category on the basis of similarity.
Journal of Ethnopharmacology 151 (2014) 921–930
Journal