G. Sarker
Fisheries and Marine Resource Technology Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna - 9208, Bangladesh
M.M. Khatun
Fisheries and Marine Resource Technology Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna - 9208, Bangladesh
M.N. Ahsan*
Fisheries and Marine Resource Technology Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna - 9208, Bangladesh
Length-Weight Relationship, Condition Factor, Puntius stigma, Chanda Beel, Gopalgonj
Chanda Beel, Gopalgonj
Animal Health and Management
Puntius stigma being small in size is widely caught and consumed by the common people. While the fish contains 18.95% protein, 6.27% lipid, 72.97% moisture on a wet weight basis (Nurullah et al., 2003), it is particularly noted for its excellent vitamin and mineral sources: 37±16 µg vitamin A and 1059±161 mg calcium (Wahab, 2003).
A total of 152 fish samples were collected randomly from Chanda beel, Muksudpur, Gopalgonj during the breeding season (August-September) of P. stigma. For the biological studies the length and weight of each specimen was recorded separately to the nearest 0.1 cm and gm, respectively. The excess water attached to the fish was removed with the help of blotting paper before taking body weight (W) by a sensitive electrical balance. The length was measured with the help of a measuring board and steel measuring tape and scale by placing the sample on it. All these materials were brought to the field spot for immediate measurement. Total length (TL) was measured from the anterior most extremity to the longest ray of the caudal fin whereas standard length (SL) was measured from the anterior most extremity to the base of the caudal fin. On the other hand, fork length (FL) of the specimen was measured from the anterior most extremity to the median rays of the tail.
The data were fitted into Le Cren’s (1951) formula W= aLn or logarithmically LogW=Loga + nlogL where W = weight of fish, L = Length (TL/SL/FL) of fish, a = intercept and n = regression co-efficient.
As the total length and fork length measurement might at times be erroneous due to damaging or breaking caudal fin rays, the standard length was chosen to measure the condition factor (K) and relative condition factor (Kn) to avoid inaccuracy in the measurement. The value of K was measured by both observed values and calculated values. Hence, the data of length were arranged in 3 cm interval.
The relative condition factor was also determined by the following formula given by Le Cren (1951):
Relative condition factor (Kn) = Observed body weight in gm / Calculated body weight
The condition factor (K) was calculated with the help of the formula given by Dewan and Doha (1973): K = W. 102 /L3
where, W = weight in gm, L = length in cm
J. Sci. technol. (Dinajpur) Vol. 5: 144-148 (2007) ISSN 1994-0386
Journal