Mithun Das
Department of Fish Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Fisheries, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chattogram-4225, Bangladesh
Md. Mahiuddin Zahangir
Department of Fish Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Fisheries, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chattogram-4225, Bangladesh
Fatema Akhter
Department of Fish Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Fisheries, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chattogram-4225, Bangladesh
Md. Main Uddin Mamun
Department of Fish Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Fisheries, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chattogram-4225, Bangladesh
Md. Moudud Islam
Corresponding author
Department of Fish Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Fisheries, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chattogram-4225, Bangladesh
Land-mark, Morphometrics, Truss-network, population structure, Tenualosa spp.
Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chattagram, Bangladesh
Variety and Species
Ethics approval and consent to participate:
This experiment was conducted by following the “animal care and use committee guideline” of Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University. The ethics issue is not required for the described study in Bangladesh. Samples are collected not from the privately owned or from protected areas and these species are not endangered or protected one.
Sample collection:
T. ilisha and T. toil were collected from the three different habitats (Coastal, riverine and marine) and preserved in icebox with the quick succession of time and brought to the laboratory of Fish Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Fisheries, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chattogram for morphometric, meristic and landmark studies. Fish samples were collected from all three locations within 3 days considering their capture date and migration time. A total of 16 fresh and healthy fish samples from each group were chosen for further analysis.
Measurement of morphometric and meristic characteristics:
Sixteen (16) general morphometric characters were measured from each sample fish by applying the conventional method described by Hubbs and Lagler (1958). The morphometric measurement was conducted with an accuracy of 0.05 mm with the help of Vernier calipers and metric scale. The measured morphometric characters used in this experiment for morphological analysis with their descriptions are presented in Table 2. Meristic characters like Dorsal fin rays (DFR), Anal fin rays (AFR), Caudal fin rays (CFR), Pectoral fin rays (PcFR), Pelvic fin rays (PvFR), number of branchiostegal rays and scales on lateral line of each sample were counted from each fish and used for comparative analysis using magnifying glass.
Measurement of Land-mark distances:
Eight landmarks outlining with 14 distances were measured on the body of Tenualosa sp (Figure 1B). The selection of landmark points were done to bring the coverage homogeneity of the total body plan in between two species based on the Strauss and Bookstein (1982). Each landmark was obtained by placing the fish sample on a graph paper and the detection of the landmark points were done with colored pointers for enabling accurate and consistent measurements. Finally, the distances found on the graph paper were determined by using centimeter scale.
Data adjustment:
The elimination of the size effects from the data set was done before the analytical studies. An allometric formula given by Elliott et al. (1995) with slight modification was used to remove the size effect from the data set.
Madj= M (Ls/Lo)b
Where,
M adj: size adjusted measurement,
M: original measurement,
Ls: overall mean of standard length for all fish from all samples in each analysis
Lo: total length of fish
Parameter „b? was estimated for each character from the observed data as the slope of the regression of log M on log Lo, using all fish in all groups. The efficiency of the size adjusted values was then correlated with the TL and the transformed values.
Statistical analysis:
In the first level of analysis, we compare among the collected samples of T. ilisha to show the morphological differences among habitats. In the second steps, we then compare between the T. ilisha and T. toil to observe the morphological distances in these two species. Univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to test the significance of morphological differences (p<0.01) on the basis of size-adjusted morphological and landmark distance data. Meristic characters among fish groups were compared using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test. In addition, all size-adjusted morphological and landmark distance data were standardized and submitted to a Discriminant Functional Analysis (DFA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA). All statistical analysis was carried out using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS version 16.0) and Microsoft office Excel, 2010.
Asian J. Med. Biol. Res. 2020, 6 (2), 265-282; doi: 10.3329/ajmbr.v6i2.48072; ISSN 2411-4472 (Print) 2412-5571 (Online)
Journal