Susmita Sarmin
Department of Agricultural Extension, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur
Md. Faruq Hasan
Department of Agricultural Extension, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur
Constraints, Food security, Small-scale farmers, Dinajpur
Dinajpur District, Bangladesh
Food Safety and Security
Dietary intake
The study was conducted in Birol Upazila of Dinajpur district. It was selected purposively among the thirteen Upazilas of the district. This Upazila is well developed and well transport system exists with the district headquarters and capital city of the country as well as the researcher is well adjusted with the socio-cultural conditions of the Upazila. That’s why it was selected for the study purposively. Among twelve unions of Birol Upazila, two unions namely Mongolpur and Ranipukur were randomly selected for the study. Among 1250 small-scale farmers in the two unions, 125 were randomly selected as samples by using a simple random sampling method. Data were collected during 15 September to 20 October 2019 by using a structured interview schedule by face-to-face interview method. The collected data were coded, compiled, tabulated and analyzed for interpretation. Different descriptive statistical measures such as frequency, number, percentage, mean, standard deviation and rank order were used for categorization and describing the variables.
A constraint-facing scale was constructed to measure the constraints faced by the smallscale farmers in achieving household food security by using closed form questions. Firstly, twenty-five constraint items of the constraints facing scale was prepared based on Agada and Igbokwe (2015), Dayo et al. (2008), Ijatuyi et al. (2017) and Joel et al. (2018). Out of these, eighteen most important constraints of the small-scale farmers of the study area were finalized in the scale based on pre-test experiences. The farmers were asked to give their opinion on 18 selected constraints which were identified by discussing with the farmers prior to data collection. A four-point rating scale was used for computing the constraint score of a respondent (Mahzabin, 2011). For each constraint, score of 3, 2, 1 and 0 was assigned to indicate the extent of constraint faced by the respondents as high, medium, low and not at all, respectively. The overall constraint facing score was computed for each of the respondent by summing their attained scores. The possible score of the Constraint Facing Index (CFI) for each of the respondent could range from 0 to 54, where 0 indicates no constraint facing and 54 indicates highest constraint facing. Based on the overall constraint facing scores the respondents were categories into three groups following the equal distribution of the possible range.
Again, the Constraint Facing Index (CFI) was computed using the following formula:
CFI = (Ch × 3) + (Cm × 2) + (Cl × 1) + (Cn × 0)
Where, CFI = Constraints Facing Index
Ch = Number of respondents mentioned the extent of facing the constraint as high Cm = Number of respondents mentioned the extent of facing the constraint as medium Cl = Number of respondents mentioned the extent of facing the constraint as low Cn= Number of respondents mentioned the extent of facing the constraint as not at all.
The CFI score for each of the constraints could range from 0 to 375, where 0 indicates the lowest extent of constraints and 375 indicates the highest extent of constraints faced by the farmers. Ranking of the constraints was done based on the CFI scores for of the constraints. Attempts were also made to find out the suggested solutions of the identified constraints using an open from question in the questionnaire. Ranking was done based on the number of citations for each of the suggestions by the respondents.
Bangladesh Journal of Extension Education, Volume 32(1): 2020
Journal