Agricultural Research Management Information System

  • Home
  • Research Summary
    • All
    • Government Organization
      • Agriculture Training Institute, Ishwardi, Pabna
      • Bangabandhu academy for poverty alleviation and rural development (BAPARD)
      • Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science & Technology University
      • Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics
      • Bangladesh Institute of Health Sciences
      • Bangladesh Institute of Tropical & Infections Diseases (BITID)
      • Bangladesh Meteorological Department
      • Bangladesh National Herbarium
      • Bangladesh Space Research and Remote Sensing Organization
      • Bangladesh Technical Educational Board
      • Barind Multipurpose Development Authority
      • Central Cattle Breeding Station
      • Department of Agriculture Extension
      • Department of Fisheries
      • Department of Livestock Services
      • Department of Youth Development
      • Dhaka Medical College
      • Geological Survey of Bangladesh
      • Institute of Epidemiology, Disease Control & Research
      • Jatiya Kabi Kazi Nazrul Islam University
      • Khulna Govt. Women College
      • Livestock Training Institute
      • Local Government Engineering Department
      • Ministry of Agriculture
      • Ministry of Environment and forest
      • Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock
      • Ministry of Labour & Employement
      • Ministry of Land
      • Ministry of Public Administration
      • Ministry of Textiles and Jute
      • Ministry of Water Resources
      • Ministry of Youth and Sports
      • National Agricultural Training Academy
      • National institute of preventive and social medicine
      • National Mushroom Development and Extension Centre
      • Pabna University of Science and Technology
      • Seed Certification Agency
      • Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College
      • Sheikh Hasina University
      • University Grants Commission
      • Youth Training Centre
    • Autonomous/Semi-gov Org
      • Bangladesh Academy for Rural Development
      • Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation
      • Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission
      • Bangladesh Council of Scientific and Industrial Research
      • Bangladesh Fisheries Development Corporation
      • Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies
      • Bangladesh Institute of Management
      • Bangladesh Milk Producers Cooperative Union Limited
      • Bangladesh Water Development Board
      • BIRDEM
      • Center for Environmental and Geographic Information Services
      • Hortex Foundation
      • Institute of Water Modeling
      • National Institute of Biotechnology
      • River Research Institute
      • Rural Development Academy
    • NARS
      • Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council
      • Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Forest Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture
      • Bangladesh Jute Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Rice Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Sericulture Research and Training Institute
      • Bangladesh Sugarcrop Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Tea Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute
      • Cotton Development Board
      • Soil Resource Development Institute
    • Public University
      • Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology
      • Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University
      • Bangamata Sheikh Fojilatunnesa Mujib Science and Technology University
      • Bangladesh Agricultural University
      • Bangladesh Open University
      • Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology
      • Bangladesh University of Professionals
      • Bangladesh University of Textiles
      • Barisal Government Veterinary College
      • Begum Rokeya University
      • Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology
      • Chittagong Veterinary and Animal Science University
      • Comilla University
      • Dhaka University of Engineering & Technology
      • Dinajpur Government Veterinary College, Dinajpur
      • Gono Bishwabidyalay
      • Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University
      • Islamic University, Kushtia
      • Jagannath University
      • Jahangirnagar University
      • Jessore University of Science and Technology
      • Jhenaidha Government Veterinary College
      • Khulna Agricultural University
      • Khulna University
      • Khulna University of Engineering & Technology
      • Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University
      • Millitary Institute of Science and Technology
      • National University
      • Noakhali Science and Technology University
      • Patuakhali Science and Technology University
      • Rajshahi University of Engineering and Technology
      • Shahjalal University of Science & Technology
      • Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University
      • Sylhet Agricultural University
      • Sylhet Government Veterinary College
      • University of Barisal
      • University of Chittagong
      • University of Dhaka
      • University of Rajshahi
    • Private University
      • Asian University of Bangladesh
      • Atish Dipankar University of Science and Technology
      • BGC Trust University Bangladesh
      • BGMEA University of Fashion & Technology (BUFT)
      • BRAC University
      • City University
      • Daffodil International University
      • East West University
      • Exim Bank Agricultural University
      • Gana Bishwabiddalaya
      • Hamdard University
      • Independent University, Bangladesh
      • International Islamic University Chittagong
      • International University of Business Agriculture and Technology
      • Islamic University of Technology
      • Leading University, Sylhet
      • North South University
      • Premier University
      • Primeasia University
      • Private University
      • SOAS, University of London
      • Southeast University
      • Stamford University
      • State University of Bangladesh
      • The Millenium University
      • University of Asia Pacific
      • University of Development Alternative
      • University of Information Technology and Sciences
      • University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh
      • University of Science and Technology, Chittagong
      • World University
    • INGO/IO/NGO/Private Org
      • ACI Limited
      • Agricultural Advisory Society (AAS)
      • Apex Organic Industries Limited
      • Arannayk Foundation
      • Bangladesh Academy of Sciences
      • Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies
      • Bangladesh Institute of Social Research
      • Bangladesh Science Foundation
      • Bangladesh Unnayan Parishad
      • BAPA
      • BRAC
      • CARE Bangladesh
      • CARITAS
      • Centre for Environmental Geographical Information System
      • Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD)
      • Creative Conservation Alliance
      • Dhaka Ahsania Mission
      • Dwip Unnayan Sangstha
      • EMBASSY OF DENMARK, BANGLADESH
      • Energypac Limited Bangladesh
      • FAO- Bangladesh
      • FIVDB
      • ICDDRB, Mohakhali, Dhaka-1212
      • iDE Bangladesh
      • Innovision Consulting Private Ltd.
      • International Center for Climate Change and Development
      • International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development
      • International Development Research Centre
      • International Fertilizer Development Center, Bangladesh
      • International Food Policy Research Institute
      • International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre
      • International Potato Center
      • IRRI- Bangladesh
      • IRRI-Philippines
      • Ispahani Agro LTD
      • IUCN, Bangladesh
      • Krishi Gobeshina Foundation
      • Lal Teer
      • Mennonite Central Committee
      • Metal (Pvt.) Ltd
      • Modern Herbal Group
      • Palli Karma-Sahayak Foundation
      • Practical Action Bangladesh
      • Proshika
      • RDRS Bangladesh
      • RIRI-Philippines
      • Rothamsted Research
      • SAARC Agricultural Centre
      • SAARC Meteorological Research Centre
      • Social Upliftment Society
      • South Asia Enterprise Development Facility
      • Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
      • Supreme Seed
      • Transparency International Bangladesh
      • Unnayan Onneshan
      • USAID
      • Water Resources Planning Organization
      • Winrock International
      • World Bank
      • World Food Program
      • World Vegetable Center
      • WorldFish Centre, Bangladesh
    • Foreign University
      • Asian Institute of Technology
      • Auckland University of Technology
      • Australian National University
      • Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya
      • BOKU-University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences
      • Cranfield University
      • Curtin University
      • Foreign University/ Institute
      • Hiroshima University
      • Hokkaido University
      • Huazhong Agricultural University
      • International Islamic University, Malaysia
      • Kagawa University
      • Kangwon National University
      • Kochi University
      • Kyoto University
      • Kyushu University
      • Ladoke Akintola University of Technology
      • Murdoch University
      • Nagoya University
      • NOAA-CREST, CCNY
      • Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University
      • San Diego State University
      • Shinshu University
      • Tottori University
      • United Nations University
      • University Malaysia Kelantan
      • University Malaysia Pahang
      • University Nova de Lisboa
      • University of Alberta
      • University of Bremen
      • University of Bremen
      • University of Calgary
      • University of california
      • University of Greenwich
      • University of Hamburg, Hamburg
      • University of Hannover
      • University of Hawaii
      • University of Helsinki, Finland
      • University of Kalyani
      • University of Leeds
      • University of Liverpool
      • University of Malaya
      • University of Milan
      • University of New England
      • University of Philippines
      • University of Plymouth
      • University of Queensland
      • University of Reading
      • University of Southampton
      • University of Texas
      • University of the Punjab
      • University of Tokyo
      • University of Toronto
      • University of Wales
      • University of Washington
      • University of Wollongong
      • University Putra Malaysia
      • University Sains Malaysia
  • Search
    • Search by Keyword
    • Search by Organization
    • Search by Program Area
    • Search by Commodity/Non-commodity
    • Search by Funding Source
    • Search by Researcher
    • Custom Search
    • On-going Research
  • About Us
    • ARMIS
    • Brochure
  • Contact Us
    • BARC Personnel
    • ARMIS Personnel
    • Feedback
  • Report
    • All
    • By Organization
      • Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council
      • Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Forest Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture
      • Bangladesh Jute Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Rice Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Sericulture Research and Training Institute
      • Bangladesh Sugarcrop Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Tea Research Institute
      • Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute
      • Cotton Development Board
      • Soil Resource Development Institute
    • Research Trend Analysis
  • User Request
  • Data Input
  • Help
    • Operation Manual
      • PDF
      • Video
    • Program Area & Commodity
  • We have reached 37600 number of research entries at this moment.
    • Logout

Research Detail

  1. Home
  2. Research
  3. Detail
C. Johansen*
15 Westgate Court, Leeming, WA 6149, Australia; b Centre for Legumes in Mediterranean Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia

M.A. Bakr
Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Joydebpur, Gazipur, Bangladesh

M. Sirajul Islam
Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Joydebpur, Gazipur, Bangladesh

N.A. Mondal
Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Joydebpur, Gazipur, Bangladesh

A. Afzal
Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Joydebpur, Gazipur, Bangladesh

W.J. MacLeod
Centre for Legumes in Mediterranean Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia

S. Pande
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh 502324, India

K.H.M. Siddique
Centre for Legumes in Mediterranean Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia

Botrytis grey mould (BGM) is the major constraint to chickpea production in Bangladesh and is considered primarily responsible for that country’s recent drastic decrease in chickpea production. There is no substantial host plant resistance to BGM in current chickpea cultivars, but component studies have developed various agronomic options to manage the disease. These include reduced seed rate, delayed sowing and thinning of plants to ensure an open canopy, and need-based foliar application of fungicide. These components were combined with other agronomic requirements for the target region, such as application of phosphate fertilizer, pest management measures against chickpea pod borer, and fungicidal seed treatment against collar rot. The resultant integrated crop management (ICM) package was compared with normal farmer practice (FP) for chickpea cultivation in farmer-managed, operational scale plots at 100 locations across five districts in western Bangladesh in the 2002–2003 and 2003–2004 seasons. Grain yields in ICM plots were generally 15–50% higher than in FP in both seasons. Conduct of these on-farm evaluations in two additional districts in 2004–2005 gave similar results. In 2004–2005, 505 farmer-managed demonstrations were conducted in the five original districts, giving a 5–104% yield advantage (district means) of ICM over FP. In 2005–2006, 642 demonstrations were conducted across the eight districts giving district-wise yield advantages of 27–70%. Effective implementation of BGM management practices by participating farmers demonstrated that remunerative and reliable chickpea yields could be obtained in this BGM-prone environment. The ICM strategy evolved has relevance to other chickpea growing regions prone to BGM in South Asia, Australia and the Americas. Studies are now required on the adoption of components of the ICM package, and the underlying reasons, to identify any adoption constraints and thus guide further promotion of chickpea cultivation.

  BGM, Pod borer, On-farm evaluation, ICM package, Chickpea demonstration, Participatory research and development, Profitability, Technology adoption
  Western Bangladesh – Jessore, Jhenaidah, Magura, Faridpur and Rajbari
  00-00-2002
  00-00-2004
  Pest Management
  Diseases, Chickpea

A project was implemented with the objective of facilitating farmer evaluation of the effectiveness of ICM packages in increasing chickpea yields. Then, if ICM packages were found promising, it was also intended to scale up the technology dissemination process across the target region. These are considered as necessary steps in the research-to adoption continuum, following the component technology development phase but preceding the technology adoption phase. 

2.1. Chickpea cultivation practices During the 2002–2003 and 2003–2004 chickpea growing seasons, the project targeted five districts in western Bangladesh – Jessore, Jhenaidah, Magura, Faridpur and Rajbari – which were traditional chickpea cultivation areas in the country (Rahman et al., 2000). In the 2004–2005 and 2005–2006 seasons, three additional adjacent districts were included in the programme – Kushtia, Chuadanga and Pabna. The soils of these districts are mostly silty loams formed on recent Gangetic alluvium (Brammer, 1996). The cropping patterns followed by the smallholder farmers of the region are predominantly based on rainy season rice (June–November) with mostly irrigated rice, wheat or vegetables in the post-rainy season; however, there are upland areas where irrigation is not readily accessible and rainfed pulses and oilseeds are grown. Usual farmer practice (FP) for chickpea cultivation in the target region is to give pre-sowing tillage usually by bullock-drawn plough or power tiller after harvest of rainy season rice during November, hand broadcast seed of a ‘‘local’’ variety (often mixed with seed of mustard, linseed or wheat), cover the seed by another ploughing and levelling, grow entirely rainfed, hand weed as required, and use no fertilizer or pesticide. The chickpea ICM package formulated for on-farm evaluation was initially based on earlier studies on BGM management (Pande et al., 2002) and subsequently modified according to findings in on-farm trials conducted during this project period in Bangladesh. It superimposed the following practices on the normal farmer practice: use of a chickpea variety less susceptible to BGM (mainly BARI chola 5, but ICCL 87322 in some cases); delayed sowing, to late November or early December to prevent excessive vegetative growth; from 2003–2004, reduction of the seed rate, from 50 to 37.5 kg ha1, to prevent excessive plant population density, thinning of the crop if required, to maintain an open canopy; need-based foliar application of fungicide (usually Bavistin1 @ 1 kg ha1) to control BGM; integrated management of chickpea pod borer (scouting for eggs and young larvae, placing of perches to encourage predator birds and need-based insecticide spray, according to Harris et al., 2008); application of triple superphosphate (TSP, @ 20 kg P ha1); and from 2004–2005, seed treatment with the fungicide Vitavax2001 to minimize collar rot.

2.2. On-farm trials Various on-farm trials were conducted, in randomized complete block design, to evaluate candidate components of the ICM package. The effects of seed priming (soaking of seed overnight prior to sowing to promote early growth vigour – Musa et al., 2001), intercropping of chickpea with wheat and linseed to reduce pest and disease incidence, and seed treatment with Bavistin1 to control seed-borne BGM were examined. In 2002–2003, the effects of priming and intercropping were tested in 400 m2 plots in five dispersed replications each at three locations and in 2003–2004 intercropping and seed treatment were tested in 267 m2 plots in five dispersed replications each at two locations. No statistically significant advantages of these treatments over the ICM control were obtained and so they were not included in the ICM package, and are not further discussed here; details of these on-farm trials are reported in CLIMA (2006).

To identify means of managing collar rot, on-farm trials were conducted in fields previously known to be infested by collar rot, in three districts in 2004–2005 and 2005–2006. In 2004–2005, treatments comprised: (1) seed treatment with Vitavax-2001; (2) clearing of rice stubble from the plot; (3) delayed sowing; (4) soil incorporation of poultry litter; (5) soil incorporation of mustard oil cake; and (6) a control (ICM without Vitavax-2001). In 2005–2006, treatments comprised: (1) seed treatment with Vitavax-2001; (2) seed treatment with mustard oil; (3) seed inoculation with antifungal microoganisms (Biopharma1); (4) seed treatment with the fungicide Rovral1; (5) soil incorporation of poultry litter; and (6) a control (ICM without Vitavax-2001). Plot size was 225 m2 and there were three dispersed replications at each location in 2004– 2005 and four in 2005–2006; the chickpea variety used was BARI chola 5.

With the objective of obtaining farmer preferences for varieties and traits of chickpea, chickpea Mother Trials (Johansen et al., 2008) were conducted with 11 entries in 2004–2005 and 13 entries in 2005–2006. Six dispersed replications were sown in Rajbari, Jessore and Jhenaidah Districts in 2004–2005, but the three replications in Rajbari were abandoned due to plot damage, and one replication each was sown in Faridpur, Jessore and Jhenaidah Districts in 2005–2006. Plot size was 25 m2 and ICM practice recommended for the particular season was followed.

2.3. On-farm evaluations From the 2002–2003 season, on-farm evaluations (OFE) compared the ICM package with prevailing FP in paired plots of 666 m2 (the average farmer field size in the target region is 1333 m2, which is 1 bigha, the local unit of area measurement). There were 100 such comparisons across five districts in each of 2002–2003 and 2003– 2004, and a further 20 in two new districts in 2004–2005. After receiving training, along with inputs for chickpea cultivation that they do not normally use (seed of improved varieties, TSP, pesticides), farmers implemented OFEs, with regular monitoring from BARI and Department of Agricultural Extension (DAE) personnel. The OFEs were established in clusters of five around a village, within selected blocks of an Upazila (sub-district). Prior to sowing land was ploughed with either tractor-drawn tynes, a power tiller or bullock-drawnmould-board plough. Seed and fertilizer were hand broadcast, the field again ploughed and then levelled. All plots were grown without irrigation. Sowing was done mostly during 20 November to 10 December. Although it was planned to sow the ICM plots after the FP plots, this proved difficult for farmers to implement due to their preoccupation at that time with harvesting of rice and sowing of post-rice crops. Thus, both treatments were invariably sown at the same time, usually at the delayed time recommended for ICM. Crops matured and were harvested during the latter half of March, although the unusually excessive rain in March 2003 delayed maturity by 1–2 weeks in that season. Grain yields were estimated in 5 1 m2 quadrats per plot by DAE Block Supervisors or other project personnel. Yields of ICM and FP plots were compared by paired ‘‘t’’ test applied for each block. Plots that grew poorly due to factors not related to the ICM practice (e.g. grazing damage) were excluded from the analysis.

 

  Field Crops Research 108 (2008) 238–249
  
Funding Source:
1.   Budget:  
  

The present study has shown that relatively high, reliable and remunerative yields of chickpea can be achieved in the region of Bangladesh where the crop has been in decline for three decades. This depends on the implementation of an ICM package that effectively manages BGM and pod borer in particular. More widespread dissemination of the technology is recommended to give resource-poor farm families of the region this low cost option of both income generation and improving their diet through increased local availability of pulse grain. The ICM strategy evaluated in this study, and in similar such studies in Nepal, would also have relevance to other chickpea growing areas of the world prone to BGM, especially in adjacent areas of South Asia, viz. northern India, Pakistan and Myanmar, subject to modification of ICM components according to the local suite of chickpea constraints. In Nepal, adoption and impact studies on the introduction of chickpea ICM indicated that around 20,000 farmers were practicing ICM after 7 years of its introduction and this was contributing to improved family income, diet and quality of housing (Pande et al., 2005). Such studies are required in Bangladesh to estimate extent of adoption and improved wellbeing of farming families attributable to adoption. These studies should also determine which components of the ICM package are being adopted and for what reason, so as to ascertain farmers’ ranking of constraints and pinpoint adoption constraints. Facilitation in the development of supply chains is needed to ensure that the required inputs are available and that local agri-business finds marketing of them profitable.

  Journal
  


Copyright © 2025. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council.